For me any dialogue, in general, implies a pre-existing or forthcoming complex situation which either will be solved within a frame of dominance, determined by the established values (always “affected” values, since root, terminal values are so generalized that have little practical use) or within a frame of autonomy.
SDD is supposed to endorse autonomy (L. of A. and A.) which is the base of democratic participation. I think SDD points to the only possible way of solving current problems and planning human future: democracy. In that sense if there is a core value in SDD that would be autonomy. SDD in itself is not and possibly could never be an exhaustive reflection going so deep down to reconstruct or even criticise basic values. Besides, this seems to be its advantage: not before but after their engagement in the SDD the participants are expected to be more willing to reflect upon their values. How effective and efficient consider themselves will be judged in a posterior moment.
Take a look at www.demothen.blogspot.com
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου